Built it
14 education products, bootstrapped from a teacher's classroom in country Victoria. 1M+ downloads across 80+ countries, multiple exits, zero VC.
A 6-week strategic engagement for education companies that need to modernise across mobile, web, AI, content and monetisation — all at once, all in service of the same roadmap. Run by someone who's built 14 of the startups you're competing with.
The mobile app you've put off for three years. The AI features your competitors shipped last quarter. The pricing model that hasn't kept up with how schools actually buy. None of these get fixed by another deck. They get fixed by someone who's shipped each one of them before.
Five-minute test: tell me what's broken and I'll tell you whether it gets fixed in 6 weeks.
The intersection of deep teacher knowledge, shipped product across mobile / web / AI, and a real customer base inside schools is essentially one person globally. That's the unfair advantage your roadmap inherits.
14 education products, bootstrapped from a teacher's classroom in country Victoria. 1M+ downloads across 80+ countries, multiple exits, zero VC.
Was a PE teacher. Has trained thousands of teachers in 35+ countries. Knows what teachers click, what they ignore, and why most edtech onboarding flops.
iOS, Android, web, AI generation, community platforms, paid memberships, conferences. Not theory — every layer of the modern edtech stack has been shipped in production and is generating revenue today.
Five questions that hold whether the modernisation is mobile, web, AI, content or all four at once. This is the framework I run inside every engagement — taught publicly so prospects can self-educate before we ever talk.
Drop the 18–25 min walkthrough into /public/method.mp4 or replace with a YouTube embed.
Where are your users losing time, energy or confidence right now?
Most companies start by asking "where can we add a new feature?" That's the wrong question. Ask "where are users losing time, energy or confidence right now?" — that's where modernisation earns its keep. Map the workflow including what happens outside your product.
What structure must the product respect to be useful in a classroom?
Free-form software is the wrong shape for education. Outputs need to be anchored in curriculum, standards, year level and the school's scope and sequence — whether that output is an AI generation, a mobile screen, a piece of content, or a pricing tier. Anchoring isn't a setting; it's an architecture.
Build, buy, or wrap?
The architecture decision is where most education companies waste 12 months. The build / buy / wrap matrix depends on the workflow stage, the user's tolerance for error, and the regulatory surface — student data, privacy, age-gating — and it applies to every layer, not just AI.
How do users find, trust, and use the new thing?
The hardest part of edtech is not building the thing. It's getting teachers to adopt the thing. This is the stage generalist consultants skip — and the stage that decides whether any modernisation, AI or otherwise, pays off.
Free the front. Charge the back.
The right monetisation pattern in education isn't "premium feature behind paywall." It's free experience, paid persistence — let users feel the value, charge for the workflow that lets them save, share, manage and reuse, at the school or district level.
6 weeks. Fixed scope. Fixed price. Built by an operator, not bolted together by a consultant.
Format: 1 × 90-min kick-off, 4 × weekly working sessions, 1 × 60-min readout. Shared workspace, Loom updates, Slack channel for the duration. 2–4 people on the client side. The menu inside each week flexes to where your modernisation gap actually is.
Sharpest fit is PE, HPE, sport and health education — where the credibility stack is unmatched. Adjacent fits work too: any education company where the buyer is a teacher, the product is one they're already trying to use, and the digital experience is overdue.
ACHPER, AfPE, SHAPE America, PHE Canada, PE-Asia, and national governing bodies with coach-education arms.
Human Kinetics and peers. Sport-science and fitness-education companies with teacher- or coach-facing products.
Broader edtech companies with PE, health, or wellbeing product lines that need AI strategy rooted in classroom reality.
Conference organisers wanting AI extensions; university HPE departments moving to hybrid or online delivery.
Honest disqualifier: if you're pre-revenue, have no customers yet, or sit outside the PE / HPE / sport-and-health adjacency, this isn't the right time. Come back when you have an existing customer base to modernise toward — that's when the 5A Method earns its keep.
App downloads across the product portfolio
Countries with active users
Countries delivered in person to teachers
If yours isn't here, ask it on the call.
Generic edtech consultancies write decks for whoever signs the cheque. They've never built a teacher-facing product, never delivered a workshop to teachers, and don't know why most edtech onboarding flops. The 5A Method is a builder's framework, not a strategist's — every recommendation is shaped by having shipped the same thing before, not researched it.
No, and you're a stronger fit than the AI-panic crowd. AI is one of several modernisation tracks the roadmap covers — mobile, web stack, content, monetisation and adoption are all in scope. If your digital is stuck and you don't even know what to call the gap yet, that's exactly what week 1 of the engagement is for.
Yes — adjacent education companies whose buyers are teachers are a strong fit. PE / HPE is where the credibility stack is unmatched, but the method generalises wherever teacher adoption is the hard part. If you're in K-12, publishing, or association-side education, talk to me.
There's a smaller 3-week diagnostic at AUD $15K available on request. It's not the main offer because most orgs need the full roadmap, but it's a sensible way in if you want to test fit before committing to six weeks. Mention it on the scoping call.
Then start with the 5A Method PDF and the LinkedIn content. They're free, they teach the framework in full, and they're enough to either (a) build the business case internally or (b) decide this isn't the right time. No call needed.
No. The offer is fixed-price for a reason — it forces tight scope, protects margin, and means the engagement ends on a deliverable, not a relationship.
Yes. Standard practice from the scoping call onward.
The qualifying form takes 4 minutes. I'll review it personally, and within 48 hours either send a calendar link for a 30-minute scoping call or point you to better-fit resources.